What should be considered when the full House January 6 committee report is released?


The final report, to be released Wednesday by the parliamentary selection committee investigating the January 6, 2021 attack, ushers in a new era for crime investigators, politicians and members of the public who want to see the foundations and bolts of their work.

In addition to the report, the committee will launch the highly anticipated release of thousands of pages of witness transcripts, the behind-the-scenes building blocks of the investigation requested by the Justice Department, Republican lawmakers and the witnesses themselves.

Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, a Mississippi Democrat, told CNN that the panel expected to release “hundreds” of transcripts, but there were some witnesses with sensitive material that the panel agreed to protect.

The committee on Monday presented a summary of its findings, including evidence on a number of penal codes it believes were violated in former President Donald Trump’s plans to ward off defeat.

Here are the things to look for on Wednesday:

In a summary of its report released earlier this week, the panel revealed that it was aware that “President Trump has made numerous efforts to contact Elected Committee witnesses,” adding that the DOJ was aware of “at least one of these circumstances.”

The summary, released on Monday, also claimed that the panel had “a body of evidence to suggest that special efforts were made to impede the Committee’s investigation”. This includes concerns that lawyers paid for by Trump’s political committee or allied groups “have specific incentives to defend President Trump rather than enthusiastically represent their clients.”

CNN previously reported that Cassidy Hutchinson, a former White House aide to Trump, told the election committee that someone had contacted her trying to influence her testimony.

“The Select Committee also has concerns about certain other witnesses, such as the First Policy Institute of America, including those whose income or employment is by entities affiliated with President Trump,” the panel said in its summary on Monday.

“Some witnesses and lawyers were unnecessarily belligerent, answering hundreds of questions with variants of ‘I don’t remember’ when that answer seemed unbelievable, appearing to testify from speeches written by lawyers rather than from their own memoirs, providing highly dubious justifications or otherwise resisting telling the truth,” he added. panel.

The summary states, “When the public examines the Committee minutes and compares the testimony of different witnesses with the conduct of the lawyer, it can ultimately make its own assessment of these matters.”

The summary also highlighted that Ivanka Trump and then-White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany were less collaborative than others.

reference Trump’s baseless claims of election fraud.” data-duration=”01:53″ data-source-html=” – Source:
” data-fave-thumbnails=”{“big”:{“uri”:”https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/221219150628-hope-hicks-testimony.jpg?c=16×9&q=h_540,w_960,c_fill”},”small”:{“uri”:”https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/221219150628-hope-hicks-testimony.jpg?c=16×9&q=h_540,w_960,c_fill”}}” data-vr-video=”” data-show-name=”” data-show-url=”” data-check-event-based-preview=”” data-network-id=”” data-details=””>

Hope Hicks talks about talking to Trump in newly released video

The synopsis details how the panel ultimately failed to persuade former White House chief of staff Tony Ornato to confirm a bombing moment during public hearings; He would not be taken to the Capitol after his speech on the Ellipse.

The committee summary said that both Hutchinson and a White House employee testified to the panel about the Ornato interview. But “Ornato admitted that he did not remember either communication and had no knowledge of the President’s anger.”

The committee wrote that it “has significant concerns about the credibility of this statement” and promised to make its transcript public. According to the report, Ornato did not remember passing the information on to Hutchinson or a White House employee with national security responsibilities. “The committee is skeptical of what Ornato has to say.”

Transcripts can help explain any inconsistencies in expression.

In terms of funding, after the 2020 presidential election and through the January 6 rallies, the committee says it has collected evidence showing that Trump “raised roughly a quarter of a billion dollars in fundraising efforts between the election and January 6.

“These claims persistently claimed and referred to nonexistent election fraud,” the panel wrote.

“For example, the Trump Campaign, along with the Republican National Committee, sent millions of emails to its supporters with messages claiming that the election was ‘fraudulent’, that their donations could prevent Democrats from ‘trying to steal the election’, and that Vice President Biden would be an ‘illegitimate president’ if he took office. ‘” statements are included.

California Democrat Representative Zoe Lofgren said the commission had evidence that the Trump family and close associates — including Kimberly Guilfoyle — personally benefited from the money raised based on the former president’s false election allegations, but the panel went so far as to say that a financial crime was never committed.

The evidence presented in the final report and the insights uncovered by the panel’s treasure trove of transcripts will be the DOJ’s first real look at what the panel holds and may inform DOJ’s January 6 criminal investigations more than criminal referrals. election commission.

According to two sources familiar with the matter, the committee has begun handing over the evidence and minutes to the Ministry of Justice.

Special counsel Jack Smith sent a letter to the selection committee on December 5 requesting all information from the panel’s investigation, a source told CNN.

The source added that the selection committee began sending out documents and transcripts as of last week, with production focusing specifically on former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and Trump’s former election attorney John Eastman.

The panel has also begun to share transcripts of witness interviews regarding fake voter lists and the pressure campaign by the former president and his allies on certain states to falsify the 2020 election results. DOJ also received all of Meadows’ text messages from the committee.

The DOJ initially requested the panel for all their transcripts in May, but committee members, especially Thompson, felt strongly that the testimonies were the property of the committee.

“This is our work product,” Thompson said in May.

On January 6, a source familiar with Trump’s legal team told CNN that the former president’s legal team would be interested in reviewing the committee minutes, which will be released in the coming days.

The former president’s aides and advisers also hope that the release of the delegation’s transcripts will provide new insights into the DOJ’s January 6 criminal investigation.

Members in Trump’s orbit will look for transcripts of those who have met with both the committee and the Justice Department to understand some of what prosecutors have.

Trump’s team follows those who testify before the grand jury and even pays the legal bill for a string of Trump aides that have emerged. Some believe the minutes may shed additional light on the special prosecutor’s investigation.

At various points during the committee’s hearings, Trump’s allies and advisers were stunned by snippets of statements they weren’t aware of before they were made public, including that of Ivanka Trump.

The committee’s final report and associated transcripts will inform, in particular, how Republicans in the House will try to fulfill their promises to investigate Biden and his administration on various fronts. Parliament next month

Various Republican lawmakers have sought to discredit the work of the elected committee since its inception, arguing that the panel failed to address the security failures that led to the breach of the U.S. Capitol. Five House Republicans, including House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, were summoned to court by the committee and did not cooperate in the investigation. In an unprecedented step, the panel referred four returning members of Congress to the House Ethics Committee.

The House GOP has formulated its own report, which will be published on January 6 when the selection committee publishes its final report.

McCarthy promised to hold hearings next year on the security failures that led to the Capitol breach, and urged the elected committee to preserve all his records and transcripts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *