Scott Peterson loses new trial offer; convicted murderer stays behind bars

Scott Peterson’s offer of a new trial was rejected Tuesday after a California judge ruled that the man convicted of murdering his wife, Laci, and their unborn son, did not warrant a new trial, despite the claims of a biased and deceptive juror.

In her 55-page verdict, Judge Anne-Christine Massullo delivered the long-awaited verdict Tuesday, in which she wrote that the juror accused of wrongdoing acted on emotion rather than prejudice against Peterson and made “honest mistakes”. ” Massullo had previously announced that he would complete his decision by Thursday.

“We won’t stop fighting until Scott is free and we find out who killed Laci and Conner.”

— Janey Peterson to Fox News Digital

SCOTT PETERSON: CALIFORNIA JUDGE TO DECIDE THE POSSIBLE NEW TRIAL RELATING TO THE MURDER OF YOUR SPOILER BY THURSDAY

Laci Peterson’s mother, Sharon Rocha, did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment. Scott Peterson’s attorney, Pat Harris, told Fox News Digital that he was “disappointed” by the decision but wrote that the case was “far from over”.

READ SCOTT PETERSON’S LAWYER’S FULL STATEMENT HERE:

Statement by Scott Peterson’s attorney, Pat Harris, regarding a judge’s decision to reject Peterson’s offer for a new trial.

“Just in the last few months, we’ve learned new information that will prove that Scott Peterson didn’t kill his wife, Laci. And we’re going to keep moving forward until he’s released.” “Coming to the verdict, the judge admits that Juror 7 has abused office, but excuses this abuse by writing that her past, contentious relationship with her boyfriend, and frequent amnesia are all excuses for her abuse of power. We respectfully disagree. “

Peterson’s half-sister and outspoken attorney, Janey Peterson, told Fox News Digital Scott that he was “innocent” and “doesn’t have an impartial jury.”

“We will not stop fighting until Scott is released and we find out who killed Laci and Conner,” he wrote in a message a minute after Tuesday’s news. “Twenty years ago this week, Laci Peterson was seen walking her dog alive after Scott left for her diary. Sometime after that walk, evidence suggests she encountered men who robbed the house across the street. These men kidnapped her and later killed her.”

READ THE JUDGE’S DECISION:

Massullo was originally scheduled to announce by December 16 his decision on whether to grant Peterson a new trial. However, it has suspended the deadline for December 8 until lawyers correct errors regarding personal information left uncorrected in recent exhibitions.

He wrote last Friday that the issue was resolved after four exhibits were corrected to correct personal information.

December 24 will mark the 20th anniversary of Laci Peterson’s disappearance.

Meanwhile, Peterson, now 50, is currently serving a life sentence at Mule Creek State Penitentiary in California.

CALIFORNIA JUDGE IN SCOTT PETERSON TEMPORARILY STOPPED NEW JURISDICTION DUE TO TYPOGRAPHY

He was found guilty of murdering his 27-year-old wife, Laci, and their unborn son, Conner, in 2004. Prosecutors argued that he killed Laci at the time and disposed of his body in San Francisco Bay on Christmas Eve 2002.

SCOTT PETERSON PRISON TRANSPLANT AND CASE REVIEW: FEELING RENOVATED ‘HOPE’ BETWEEN FAMILY

Laci Peterson before she disappeared in 2002.

Laci Peterson before she disappeared in 2002.
(AP, File)

The California Supreme Court quashed Peterson’s death sentence in 2020 after reports emerged of the improper dismissal of prospective jury candidates, but the court continued his conviction.

LACI PETERSON LOST 19 YEARS AGO: THE TRAGIC CASE THAT SENT FAMILY AND PEOPLE TO THE CROSPITAL FOR JUSTICE

While awaiting his fate, Peterson was transferred from San Quentin State Penitentiary in California to Mule Creek State Penitentiary in October.

Scott Peterson is seeking a new trial after being convicted of murdering his pregnant wife, Laci, in California in 2004.

Scott Peterson is seeking a new trial after being convicted of murdering his pregnant wife, Laci, in California in 2004.

Peterson’s lawyers argued that a new trial was necessary because juror Richelle Nice was biased and lied in her survey to get into the jury. Meanwhile, prosecutors argued that Nice “did its best when faced with a 23-page questionnaire consisting of 163 questions”.

“His answers are inconsistent,” prosecutor David Harris told the court earlier. “But being wrong doesn’t necessarily make him wrong or make him a liar. He can just be really bad at filling out forms.”

A boy looks at a missing person's banner and memorial offering an award for the safe return of Laci Peterson at East La Loma Park in Modesto, California, January 4, 2003.

A boy looks at a missing person’s banner and memorial offering an award for the safe return of Laci Peterson at East La Loma Park in Modesto, California, January 4, 2003.
(Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD FOX NEWS APP

Nice had previously stated that he had no prejudices against Peterson until he heard the evidence presented at the trial.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *