Mistrial Revealed in Danny Masterson Rape Case on ‘The ’70s Show’

A judge declared a wrongful trial in the rape case Wednesday. That 70’s Show Actor Danny Masterson, after the jury said he was stuck on charges, the Associated Press reported.

Masterson, 46, was raped three times, either forcibly or in fear, for allegedly sexually harassing three women in her Hollywood Hills home in 2001 and 2003. he took them to his bedroom and raped them violently.

Masterson is best known for playing Steven Hyde. That 70’s ShowHe denied the accusations and claimed that he only had sexual intercourse with women with his consent. If found guilty, he could face a life sentence of up to 45 years.

According to the AP, jurors said they had voted seven times in the past two days and were unable to reach a consensus on any of the three numbers. On the first count, only two jurors voted to convict, for the second count, four voted for conviction, and for the third count, five voted to convict.

The judge gave March for a retrial.

The mistrial comes after negotiations restarted from scratch after two jurors tested positive for COVID-19 earlier this week and were replaced by two substitute jurors. The original jury had declared that they had reached a dead end on November 18 after three days of deliberation, but at that point, the judge ordered them to continue their work to reach a unanimous verdict.

The weeks-long trial featured extensive discussions about the Church of Scientology, along with Masterson’s uncensored testimony from three women accused of rape and a fourth woman accusing him of sexual assault.

Despite attempts by Masterson, a prominent Scientologist, to keep the church out of trial, institutions and practices took center stage as the three women, all former Scientologists, testified over allegations that church officials were trying to shield the actor from accountability. .

A woman, identified as JB at the time of her testimony, told jurors that she thought Masterson was going to kill her while describing how the actor suffocated and suffocated her with a pillow while he sexually assaulted her in April 2003. more than a year later, until he first reported the incident to the police.

In the church community, as Masterson understands it to be, “you can’t report another Scientologist in good standing” because he testified that he hadn’t gone to the police before.

He said he would have “immediately committed a high crime” and was expelled from the church, meaning that no members could speak to him or have any communication with him. For JB, this meant breaking away from his parents and all of his friends, who were also Scientologists, lived with and worked for.

“My life was going to end,” he testified.

During the closing debates, Masterson’s attorney, Philip Cohen, separated the women’s statements and highlighted inconsistencies in what he told law enforcement, their family and friends, and in their testimony at the trial. Cohen argued that the inconsistencies raise reasonable enough suspicion to the jurors that what he said was not true.

“[Prosecutors] “They want to win this case so badly that they just ignored it until that closing debate,” Cohen said. “They ignored the obvious, obvious, overwhelming contradictions and fabrications that Jane Doe gave you.”

Meanwhile, Los Angeles County Assistant District Attorney Reinhold Mueller argued that such differences in the women’s statements were natural given the passage of time, the great trauma they had experienced, and the fact that they had to talk to different investigators about the issue at different times. asking different questions. He also noted that the main details in the women’s stories remained consistent over the years.

“Each time, they have to uncover what’s inside them to bring out that trauma,” Mueller said. “They did their best to answer the questions we asked them here in court,” he said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *